![Gas bubbles from a leak in the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline reach the surface of the Baltic Sea near Bornholm, Denmark [Danish Defence Command/Handout via Reuters]](https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/iema.net/photos/_person/2022-09-27T130452Z_309811351_RC2OPW9Y2OTL_RTRMADP_3_UKRAINE-CRISIS-DENMARK-REGULATOR.jpg.webp)
European countries, particularly Germany, had already expressed concern about the continued supply of natural gas via pipelines from Russia, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine at the start of 2022.
Planned and unplanned shutdowns of supply have taken place across recent months, but this most recent interruption of supply has raised concerns about energy security even further, because of suspicions about the use of explosives to damage the pipelines.
The pipelines affected by the suspected explosions are still in the process of releasing their entire volumes of natural gas. The primary component of natural gas is methane – a potent greenhouse gas – which means that the global warming potential of the release from the pipelines is equivalent to one third of Denmark’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.
Rolls Royce is one of the companies which helped build the Nord Stream pipelines. They are also IEMA corporate partners.
Patrick Horgan, Director Global Network at Rolls Royce, said:
“Geopolitical risk and international volatility are constants we are accustomed to dealing with, but it’s clear that we are currently experiencing a period of extreme change and disruption, a departure from business-as-usual volatility.
“Political risk is listed as one of our Group Principal Risks and we have a process for assessing and managing it. We recognise that it is not a neatly defined, unitary risk, but a complex field in which the actual risks are defined by external factors over which we may have little or no control.
“Horizon scanning and situational awareness are key to anticipating and dealing with any emerging risks. Our approach uses multiple internal and external sources and pre-emptive mitigation measures, calibrated for the specifics of the actual risks we identify.”
Dr Andrew Coburn, CEO at Risilience, also pointed to the “apparent deliberateness” of the Nord Stream incident. He said:
“Given the extent of economic value spread globally through supply chains, geopolitical risks should absolutely feature in corporates’ outlook discussions.
“The unipolarity which characterised the late 20th century is very much at an end, and we are currently in transition to a multipolar world in which multiple actors command significant influence, which changes the behaviour of geopolitical risks tremendously. It is absolutely worth dedicating specific effort to understanding and managing geopolitical risks and exploring means of mitigation so that this transition proceeds as smoothly as possible.”
It is clear that the Nord Stream explosion represents another front opening up in the sustainability sector – with geopolitical risk having to now factor in alongside environmental, economic, cultural, technological and social risks.
Subscribe
Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.
Posted on 7th October 2022
Latest Posts
-
Launch of new resource for conservation technology tools
- 11th July 2024 -
Natural Capital 101: Guide for Sustainability Professionals
- 9th July 2024 -
Analysing the manifesto pledges of Plaid Cymru, the Scottish National Party, and Reform UK
- 24th June 2024 -
Join the Sustainable Finance Network Steering Group
- 19th June 2024 -
Sustainable Finance Insight Journal Volume 2: Disclosure, Transparency and Reporting in Sustainable Finance
- 19th June 2024 -
Labour sets out plans for Great British Energy at manifesto launch
- 13th June 2024