On the eve of the Environment Council, the EEB and the Austrian Environment Minister Josef Pröll are co-hosting tomorrow a discussion between European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas and EU environment ministers, specifically to discuss the Sustainable Development Strategy.
The EEB considers the proposed strategy - due for adoption at the June European Summit - to lack a clear vision and clear targets. The strategy should contain much bolder new policy initiatives if the economic, social and environmental objectives of the Lisbon process are to be simultaneously achieved. Launching a major public procurement campaign to boost the use of energy-efficient products and services, for example, and taking a more critical attitude to biofuel use in the EU, are just two of the EEB's requests. John Hontelez, Secretary General of the EEB, said today: " We very much look forward to an open and concrete dialogue with Europe 's environment ministers. Clear leadership is needed from them on the urgent initiatives the EEB is proposing, such as environmental taxation reform in all EU Member States. Another key element should be an agreement on effective instruments for accelerating the uptake of eco-innovations - such as performance targets for major product groups, and levies or subsidies to steer market uptake. In addition we insist on priority attention being given to green public procurement across the Union ".
Thursday's Environment Council will also debate GMO policy in the EU. The EEB urges ministers to ensure that risk assessment requirements of EU legislation on GMOs are strictly implemented, coupled with full transparency and public access to data. Member State concerns should be taken carefully into account by both the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Commission, before the authorisation process of GMOs in Europe is taken any further. Regarding the discussion on the Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution, the EEB thinks Member States must commit to more environmental protection by raising the ambition level. Kerstin Meyer, EEB Policy Officer for Air, said: "Considering the devastating health effects of air pollution, it is irresponsible if Member States are not prepared to push for further reductions. The problems with meeting current requirements should not be used as an excuse. A recent EEB report shows that this is due to acting too late and investing insufficiently in protection policies - Members States' current plans risk remaining paper tigers because they are underfinanced".
Subscribe
Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.
Posted on 7th March 2006
Latest Posts
-
IEMA focus on skills, adaptation and nature-based solutions in CCC report
- 18th July 2024 -
Labour's plan for economic growth must mean green growth – but there is a green skills gap looming
- 5th July 2024 -
As Labour plans to “slash red tape” for economic growth, YouGov poll finds 3 in 5 people want to increase public involvement in planning system
- 28th June 2024 -
Medtronic agrees partnership with IEMA to accelerate skills and standards in sustainability
- 21st June 2024 -
Landmark climate impact ruling for fossil fuel projects, cites IEMA guidance
- 20th June 2024 -
IEMA sets out 18 policy asks for the next Government
- 3rd June 2024