By rejecting the Commission's approach to municipal waste incinerators, the Visegrad Ministers recognise that the Commission's proposal is unacceptable. The classification of municipal waste incinerators as recovery facilities is an attack on several fronts," said Stefan Scheuer, EEB's EU Policy Director. "This would allow companies to move waste for burning much more easily. Central Europe must not become a dustbin for its richer neighbours."
The Commission aims to classify municipal waste incinerators as 'recovery facilities' once they achieve a certain level of energy efficiency , reversing a ruling by the European Court of Justice that they are, in fact, disposal facilities.
The Commission claims its proposal is justified by the need to promote energy efficiency in incinerators. But the Commission really seems to be mainly concerned with promoting incineration to help Member States carry out their obligation to divert biowaste away from landfill sites instead of promoting recycling.
"The Visegrad statement stresses that there are other ways of enforcing the Waste Incineration Directive's existing requirements to achieve energy efficiency than the Commission's recovery dodge," said EEB's Melissa Shinn.
"We want other countries, especially Germany , to recognise the need to take a different approach from that of the Commission. The EU's waste policy should not make it easier for people to burn waste, especially recyclable biowaste. Nor should it go against the 'proximity' principle of keeping waste as close to home as possible, and maintaining political pressure to find better solutions both for the environment and jobs, by preventing, reusing and recycling waste".
The policy encouraging producers to curb waste generation will be undermined by weakening the 'self-sufficiency' and 'proximity' principles. But those are not the only waste management principles that this approach threatens.
Defining municipal incinerators as 'recovery facilities' will not only damage the policy driving waste producers to cut or recycle and compost their waste output it will also 'green' the image of incineration which can be very relevant for distorting the application of EU Structural funds. EU subsidies for incineration result in an un-level playing field for investment in re-use and recycling. Re-use and recycling not only deliver better long-term environmental advantages but also provide far greater job opportunities.
Subscribe
Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.
Posted on 18th May 2006
Latest Posts
-
IEMA focus on skills, adaptation and nature-based solutions in CCC report
- 18th July 2024 -
Labour's plan for economic growth must mean green growth – but there is a green skills gap looming
- 5th July 2024 -
As Labour plans to “slash red tape” for economic growth, YouGov poll finds 3 in 5 people want to increase public involvement in planning system
- 28th June 2024 -
Medtronic agrees partnership with IEMA to accelerate skills and standards in sustainability
- 21st June 2024 -
Landmark climate impact ruling for fossil fuel projects, cites IEMA guidance
- 20th June 2024 -
IEMA sets out 18 policy asks for the next Government
- 3rd June 2024