Research published last year found there had been a sharp rise in the incidence of category 4 and 5 storms - the strongest - in recent decades.
But other scientists caution there may be errors in historical storm records. Hurricane formation is strongly linked to sea surface temperature, with warmer waters more likely to form storms.
Sea surface temperature and hurricane strength vary naturally, and deciphering a clear impact of human greenhouse gas emissions has been difficult. However, the last two years have seen several major pieces of research which have at least increased understanding of the issue, without settling it conclusively.
In July last year, Kerry Emanuel, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published research showing that the duration, maximum wind speeds and energy released in tropical storms has increased markedly in both the North Atlantic and the North Pacific oceans since the mid-1970s. A few months later Peter Webster from the Georgia Institute of Technology documented a rise in the incidence of category 4 and 5 storms; the 15-year period from 1975 to 1989 saw 171 severe hurricanes, but the number rose to 269 for the subsequent 15 years.
He told the BBC News website at the time: "What I think we can say is that the increase in intensity is probably accounted for by the increase in sea surface temperature, and I think probably the sea surface temperature increase is a manifestation of global warming." Then in June this year, Kevin Trenberth of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research analysed the exceptionally active 2005 North Atlantic hurricane season.
Sea surface temperatures (SST) had been 0.9C above the long-term average, he found; and by comparing the North Atlantic with other regions of the ocean, he deduced that human greenhouse gas emissions accounted for about half of this rise. The latest research takes things another step further, using 22 computer models of climate to examine a possible link between SSTs and human-induced global warming. These models typically deal in projections and probabilities, which is inevitable with a huge and chaotic system such as global climate.
Benjamin Santer, Tom Wigley and colleagues conclude: "There is an 84% chance that external forcing [human activities] explain at least 67% of the observed SST increases" in the Pacific and Atlantic zones where hurricanes form. "The important conclusion is that the observed SST increases in these hurricane breeding grounds cannot be explained by natural processes alone," said Dr Wigley.
"The best explanation for these changes has to include a large human influence." On a political level, the debate over hurricane intensity has become a poster child for climate sceptics. They object to what they regard as overblown, opportunistic links made by some commentators between the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, in particular, and rising greenhouse gas concentrations. Their arguments are given scientific underpinning by problems which some researchers have identified in historical records of storms.
Subscribe
Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.
Posted on 19th September 2006
Latest Posts
-
IEMA focus on skills, adaptation and nature-based solutions in CCC report
- 18th July 2024 -
Labour's plan for economic growth must mean green growth – but there is a green skills gap looming
- 5th July 2024 -
As Labour plans to “slash red tape” for economic growth, YouGov poll finds 3 in 5 people want to increase public involvement in planning system
- 28th June 2024 -
Medtronic agrees partnership with IEMA to accelerate skills and standards in sustainability
- 21st June 2024 -
Landmark climate impact ruling for fossil fuel projects, cites IEMA guidance
- 20th June 2024 -
IEMA sets out 18 policy asks for the next Government
- 3rd June 2024